News, sports, politics, blogs and forums for Jordan, Minnesota • (952) 492-2224

Jordan, Minnesota

Keep up with the Independent! Sign up for email newsletters and RSS feeds.
Click to Login
No account? Sign up!

Advertising

City considers dangerous-dog ordinance


» Read similar stories filed under:

The city of Jordan is considering a dangerous-dog ordinance that would establish a procedure by which a dog may be declared dangerous or potentially dangerous.

"It is very important that we closely monitor and regulate dogs after
they have attacked or bit someone," Police Chief Bob Malz wrote in a
report to the council.

The proposed ordinance also allows, among other things:

- an animal control officer to designate dogs as potentially dangerous;

- potentially dangerous dogs to be impounded if they are an "immediate threat to public safety";

- the city to require the owner of a potentially dangerous dog to have a microchip implanted in the dog for identification;

- the owner of a potentially dangerous dog to appeal the designation;

- the owner of a potentially dangerous dog to have an annual review of the designation for a fee of $50 a hearing;

- the city to require that potentially dangerous dogs be licensed for an annual fee of $50 and registered;

- an animal control officer to seize potentially dangerous dogs if the dogs are not enclosed, restrained, registered, or insured;

Advertisement. Article continues below.

- a potentially dangerous dog that has bitten someone to be quarantined and examined for rabies;

- potentially dangerous dogs to be disposed of, if they are not reclaimed within 10 days of confinement.

According to the proposed ordinance, a dog may be declared dangerous if it:

- has without provocation, inflicted substantial bodily harm on a person;

- has killed a domestic animal without provocation while off its owner's property;

-
or has been found to be potentially dangerous, and after the owner has
notice that the dog is potentially dangerous, the dog aggressively
bites, attacks, or endangers the safety of people or domestic animals.

In a 5-0 vote, the Jordan City Council approved the first reading of
the ordinance. Councilmembers Barry Ullmann and David Hanson were
absent from the meeting. The ordinance will not take effect until after
a second reading, public hearing, and publication of the ordinance.



Glad to see that the city is...

Back to page top

Glad to see that the city is considering an ordinance based on a case-by-case basis and not singling out a specific breed.


Submitted by Ruth Anne Maddox on July 8, 2008 - 11:41am.

This ordinance concerns me...

Back to page top

This ordinance concerns me in that it is left to the discretion of the officer. What will an officer deem as a dangerous dog? Will it vary from officer to officer and day-to-day?

What if a person or child teases and beats on a dog and the dog responds -- is it the dog's fault?

Rather than take away the dog, how about issuing a ticket/fine. It is then left to the owner and not the police.


Submitted by swansonmej on July 8, 2008 - 3:56pm.

Jordan needs to rethink...

Back to page top

Jordan needs to rethink their pet ordinance laws and get with the times. the leash law is in effect but the home owners dont get in trouble for barking dogs and persons dont walk there dogs and they let dogs outside without a leash-how do my neighbors think they can garden mow lawn and let dogs run arround no leash and i see dogs in street and five houses down-police drive by and c it-happening-a leash law would be first things first in gods eyes and mine the rules are not folllowed now-but what is a ordanince???? in chaska i knew when i lived there and in mpls-JORDAN nope------so leash law is first-then c what dogs dangerous or are they watched by owners or at large on 282-john and todd


Submitted by todd s. on September 14, 2008 - 11:24am.

I hope the city will allow...

Back to page top

I hope the city will allow people to read the ordinance and have their concerns addressed before they pass this.When is the public hearing?


Submitted by h on July 10, 2008 - 11:13am.

I'm not in the office right...

Back to page top

I'm not in the office right now, so I can't tell you the exact date of the public hearing, but I know there will be one in a week or more. For more information, call the city hall at 952-492-2535.

(Mathias Baden is the editor of the Jordan Independent. He can be reached at editor@jordannews.com.)


Submitted by Mathias Baden on July 11, 2008 - 11:16am.

My previous comment is in...

Back to page top

My previous comment is in error. According to Police Chief Bob Malz, a public hearing is not required. Read his column in the print edition of the Jordan Independent this week for more details and answers to many other questions addressed on the topic of the proposed dangerous-dog ordinance.

(Mathias Baden is the editor of the Jordan Independent. He can be reached at editor@jordannews.com.)


Submitted by Mathias Baden on July 15, 2008 - 12:40pm.

The second reading of the...

Back to page top

The second reading of the dangerous-dog ordinance is scheduled for Monday night, after which the city council will be asked to approve the new policies.

(Mathias Baden is the editor of the Jordan Independent. He can be reached at editor@jordannews.com.)


Submitted by Mathias Baden on July 18, 2008 - 11:21am.

Isn't Scott County also...

Back to page top

Isn't Scott County also looking at a dangerous dog ordinance? And, if the county passes one that differs from those the various cities choose to have will it supercede what the cities do?


Submitted by Ruth Anne Maddox on July 11, 2008 - 12:40pm.

Scott County passed a...

Back to page top

Scott County passed a similar ordinance by a unanimous vote earlier this month. It affects the 11 townships under the jurisdiction of the county, according to the Belle Plaine Herald.

(Mathias Baden is the editor of the Jordan Independent. He can be reached at editor@jordannews.com.)


Submitted by Mathias Baden on July 18, 2008 - 11:13am.

Jordan needs to rethink...

Back to page top

Jordan needs to rethink their pet ordinance laws and get with the times. The police need to hold to a 2 minute & ticket someone when their dog is outside barking and barking. People who are good to their pets should be allowed to have as many pets as they want if they leash them and dont let them bark alot-todd s


Submitted by todd s. on September 14, 2008 - 11:14am.

Advertising

Recent comments

Advertising

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 171 guests online.

Who's new

  • kipper31
  • kk666666
  • ycartecniv
  • mark.allen.johnson
  • jtownmomof3

Hot Jobs

Electrician, Kroll Ontrack
Sales, The Work Connection
Sales
Sales, Kroll Ontrack
HVAC Engineer, Kroll Ontrack

Advertising